erin.leaman wrote:GotButterflies wrote:123AE wrote:Thanks I was struggling between an e a ruggie and a small chance of a blueberry
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Blueberries are protected. They are endangered. Anyone that has one of those is fortunate. I don't think they will be in the pet trade again. Still could be a ruggie, you never know

If they are endangered, do you think the HCA is capable of raising a breeding project? Even though barely any crabs make it far along their youth, we could at least try to boost the numbers, right?
Okay, are you talking about raising hermits in captivity and releasing them in the wild? That's not a good idea due to risk of spreading diseases, fungus, parasites, etc to wild populations. When they're caught, they get exposed to a lot of stuff from a wide mix of populations on their way to our crabitats (that plus intense stress = PPS in my opinion), and who knows what they've picked up. If we release them into the wild, we risk exposing wild populations to diseases, fungus, parasites, etc, that they haven't seen before, and it could decimate them. So unfortunately, once a hermie is living in captivity, it needs to stay in captivity for the good of the remaining wild crabs. We don't know what captive crabs are passing down to their offspring, so their offspring should stay in captivity too, in order to protect the wild populations. At least until we understand hermit crab biology and pathology better. There's not much financial incentive to research hermit crab biology and pathology directly, so this could take a while.
EDIT: I'm only talking about breeding animals captured through the pet trade above. Breed and release as a general concept to increase crab populations I think is a great idea as long as healthy crabs native to a particular area are chosen, their offspring are released into the area they're endemic to, and steps are taken to preserve the health of the remaining wild populations.